Chez Marstar: M14 sans le receiver à 599$... Pourquoi?

Tel que vu aujourd'hui dans un courriel de Marstar...

Parts Kit Chinese Marstar ‘GI Rifle’ in a Synthetic Stock (7.62×51 Nato)

... En spécial à 599$

Si je comprends bien, ça semble être une Norinco M305 18.5" de canon complète sauf le receiver puisque cette arme fut déclarée prohibée l'an dernier.

Ma question est juste... Pourquoi?

Qui va payer 599$ pour une M305 sans l'action?

Lewis77 a écrit:

Tel que vu aujourd'hui dans un courriel de Marstar...

Parts Kit Chinese Marstar ‘GI Rifle’ in a Synthetic Stock (7.62×51 Nato)

... En spécial à 599$

Si je comprends bien, ça semble être une Norinco M305 18.5" de canon complète sauf le receiver puisque cette arme fut déclarée prohibée l'an dernier.

Ma question est juste... Pourquoi?

Qui va payer 599$ pour une M305 sans l'action?

Un gars s'essaye si t'en as 250 qui traînent dans un container.

Est-ce que ça peut compléter un receiver de m1 Garand ? Penserait pas mais bon

Parts kits

DT741 a écrit:

Parts kits

Parts kits pour quoi? Personne ne va garder une arme prohibée

Lucky Luke a écrit:

Est-ce que ça peut compléter un receiver de m1 Garand ?  Penserait pas mais bon

Non le nombre de pièces est assez limité selon ce que j'ai trouvé sur internet:

Citation :

"M14 Rifle History and Development Fourth Edition page 384

The following parts are interchangeable between the M1 Garand and the M14 type rifle: butt swivel, lower butt plate screw, rear sight aperture, elevation knob and pinion (note that the M14 elevation knob is calibrated in meters, while the M1 Garand elevation knob is calibrated in yards), rear sight base, sight cover, trigger (although the sear requires slight modification of the M14 sear for use in the M1 Garand rifle), hammer, hammer spring, hammer spring plunger, hammer spring housing, safety, hammer pin, trigger pin, extractor, extractor spring, extractor spring plunger, hand guard band (as long as it has not been deformed during removal from the M14 rifle hand guard or the M1 Garand rifle rear hand guard), and butt plates on certain M14 stocks.

A M1 Garand rifle ejector will fit inside a M14 bolt if mated to a M14 ejector spring. However, it is best to use the M14 ejector. The M1 ejector has a single beveled surface on its forward end. The ejector for the M14 was improved by creating two beveled surfaces on the forward end. This minor change resulted in a much more consistent ejection path for spent cartridge cases.

Hammers marked with part numbers C46008, C5546008 and D5546008 are often found in the firing mechanisms of commercial M14 type rifles. These markings indicate World War II, early 1950s and mid-to-late 1950s production M1 Rifle hammers, respectively. The letter prefix of the part number indicated the actual physical size of the part drawing.

The M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plunger may cause a problem with the M1A rifle. The design for the USGI M1 rifle hammer spring plunger, B6008880, was originally drawn on August 02, 1937. In 1978, Springfield Armory, Inc. assembled M1A firing mechanisms with modified M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plungers. The head portion of the M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plunger was originally designed with “wings” or “ears” akin to the M1 receiver rear sight pocket. The hammer spring plungers were modified by grinding down the left side “wings” before assembling into the M1A firing mechanisms. By not grinding the “wings” of the hammer spring plunger, the hammer spring plunger may move out of the hammer notch which could cause the hammer to move. The USGI drawing B6008880 was revised, likely in 1958, to remove the “wings” from the head portion of the hammer spring plunger. Nonetheless, both types of hammer spring plungers are acceptable for USGI M14 rifle overhauls per U. S. Army DMWR 9-1005-223. The M1 hammer spring plunger is often used in match grade M14 type rifles.

Matt_mg a écrit:

Lucky Luke a écrit:

Est-ce que ça peut compléter un receiver de m1 Garand ?  Penserait pas mais bon

Non le nombre de pièces est assez limité selon ce que j'ai trouvé sur internet:

Citation :

"M14 Rifle History and Development Fourth Edition page 384

The following parts are interchangeable between the M1 Garand and the M14 type rifle: butt swivel, lower butt plate screw, rear sight aperture, elevation knob and pinion (note that the M14 elevation knob is calibrated in meters, while the M1 Garand elevation knob is calibrated in yards), rear sight base, sight cover, trigger (although the sear requires slight modification of the M14 sear for use in the M1 Garand rifle), hammer, hammer spring, hammer spring plunger, hammer spring housing, safety, hammer pin, trigger pin, extractor, extractor spring, extractor spring plunger, hand guard band (as long as it has not been deformed during removal from the M14 rifle hand guard or the M1 Garand rifle rear hand guard), and butt plates on certain M14 stocks.

A M1 Garand rifle ejector will fit inside a M14 bolt if mated to a M14 ejector spring. However, it is best to use the M14 ejector. The M1 ejector has a single beveled surface on its forward end. The ejector for the M14 was improved by creating two beveled surfaces on the forward end. This minor change resulted in a much more consistent ejection path for spent cartridge cases.

Hammers marked with part numbers C46008, C5546008 and D5546008 are often found in the firing mechanisms of commercial M14 type rifles. These markings indicate World War II, early 1950s and mid-to-late 1950s production M1 Rifle hammers, respectively. The letter prefix of the part number indicated the actual physical size of the part drawing.

The M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plunger may cause a problem with the M1A rifle. The design for the USGI M1 rifle hammer spring plunger, B6008880, was originally drawn on August 02, 1937. In 1978, Springfield Armory, Inc. assembled M1A firing mechanisms with modified M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plungers. The head portion of the M1 Garand rifle hammer spring plunger was originally designed with “wings” or “ears” akin to the M1 receiver rear sight pocket. The hammer spring plungers were modified by grinding down the left side “wings” before assembling into the M1A firing mechanisms. By not grinding the “wings” of the hammer spring plunger, the hammer spring plunger may move out of the hammer notch which could cause the hammer to move. The USGI drawing B6008880 was revised, likely in 1958, to remove the “wings” from the head portion of the hammer spring plunger. Nonetheless, both types of hammer spring plungers are acceptable for USGI M14 rifle overhauls per U. S. Army DMWR 9-1005-223. The M1 hammer spring plunger is often used in match grade M14 type rifles.

http://forums.thecmp.org/showthread.php?t=278266